Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BUCK Live

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Also the article about the band BUCK Enterprises has been deleted so this qualifies for deletion under CSD A9, as a music recording by redlinked artist and no indication of importance or significance, as well. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:04, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BUCK Live

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:24, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm voting delete at this debate and at a similar one, Speechless EP. Google News searches provided nothing relevant and as I have mentioned at the Speechless EP debate, I plan to nominate the band's article soon after compiling my results and searches. SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What does not being on Google News have to do with a band not existing? I can't find any tour dates for The Turtles on Google News either. You aren't deleting their article are you. --Primetech 19:14, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

The issue is not whether the band exists. It did. The issue is whether the album is notable. It isn't. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:56, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the information here is useful, especially to people looking for cover art or searching for a de facto guide to BUCK (or music in general. --Primetech 19:14, 22 January 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Primetech (talk • contribs)

For the record, I never said the band "never existed", I simply said they and this album weren't notable. At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BUCK Enterprises, I showed how although several results were events, there wasn't much in-depth coverage about them. The information being useful is one thing but notability is another, the article needs reliable third-party attention such as reviews but there doesn't seem to be any. As for your other comment above, searching for detailed tour dates for The Turtles probably wouldn't be easy as it was nearly fifty years ago and would require significant digging. However, a search "The Turtles 1967 tour" provided some reunion tours here. SwisterTwister talk 23:10, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:14, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable album by non-notable band. No known coverage in reliable sources that might establish notability. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:58, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.